[ad_1]
- The court ruling finds that ICANN-accredited domain name registrars 35.cn and OnlineNic are alter egos, potentially resulting in 35.cn having to pay over $5 million to Meta Platforms.
- Meta Platforms sued OnlineNic and its privacy service in October 2019, alleging that they or their customers used domains infringing on Facebook and Instagram trademarks.
- Judge Susan Van Keulen issued terminating sanctions against OnlineNic and Domain ID Shield, awarding Facebook $3.135 million in statutory damages for cybersquatting.
- OnlineNic may also be responsible for attorneys’ fees and costs of a Special Master.
- It is argued that 35.cn and OnlineNic are alter egos, with U.S. District Judge Susan Illston ruling that they are, potentially making 35.cn liable for over $5 million.
Domain Name Registrars 35.cn and OnlineNic Ruled as Alter Egos, Leading to Potential $5 Million Liability
A court ruling has determined that 35.cn and OnlineNic, both ICANN-accredited domain name registrars, are alter egos. This has significant implications as it could mean that 35.cn will have to pay more than $5 million to Meta Platforms. The ruling comes as a result of a lawsuit filed by Meta Platforms against OnlineNic and its privacy service in 2019, alleging the use of domains that infringed on Facebook and Instagram trademarks. Judge Susan Van Keulen issued terminating sanctions against OnlineNic and Domain ID Shield, awarding Facebook $3.135 million in statutory damages for cybersquatting. Additionally, OnlineNic may be responsible for attorneys’ fees and costs associated with the case. It has been argued that 35.cn and OnlineNic are alter egos, and U.S. District Judge Susan Illston has ruled in agreement, potentially making 35.cn liable for over $5 million.
[ad_2]
Original Source News Link
